Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Johnson Module 6 Blog

Learning in a Digital World

My current area of instructional interest is adult education.  Of all the popular learning theories, the adult learning theory is a sole and separate one that doesn’t seem to get talked or written about as much as some of the others.  “Andragogy is a set of assumptions about how adults learn” (Fidishun, n.d.).  Knowles is credited with developing the theory of andragogy that explains how adults learn and how to best prepare to teach them.  Knowles posited that adults and children learned differently, and adult learning was distinguished by the following:

“1. Self-concept: As a person matures his self-concept moves from one of being a dependent personality toward one of being a self-directed human being

2. Experience: As a person matures he accumulates a growing reservoir of experience that becomes an increasing resource for learning.

3. Readiness to learn: As a person matures his readiness to learn becomes oriented increasingly to the developmental tasks of his social roles.

4. Orientation to learning: As a person matures his time perspective changes from one of postponed application of knowledge to immediacy of application, and accordingly his orientation toward learning shifts from one of subject-centeredness to one of problem-centeredness.

5. Motivation to learn: As a person matures the motivation to learn is internal” (Smith, 2002).

Boggs said that adult education should enhance the life of the adult learner, and “adult educational experiences should enhance personal growth and make it easier for adults to adapt to internal and external changes until the end of life” (Cooper, 2009). Based on the adult theory of learning as espoused by Knowles, my philosophy of learning for adult students is different from a philosophy of learning I might have for students K-12.  I believe instruction for adult students must be relevant; they must be able to relate to it and see where it fits in with their life and fulfills a need in their life or professions that they can readily see.  Adult students bring a lifetime of knowledge and experience to their instruction, and I believe as an instructor I need to tap into that resource and include their personal experiences in the lessons I teach.  Adult students should be actively involved in their learning; my lessons should be based on their goals and objectives from the class.  For this reason, I survey incoming students to find out what their goals and objectives from the class are, then modify my lessons to meet as many of those goals and objectives as possible.  Adult students have different sensitivities than younger students may have, so my instruction must take those sensitivities into consideration.  I must allow my adult students to express themselves throughout the learning process and I must create a safe, comfortable environment where they do not feel threatened or embarrassed for doing so.

Adults are autonomous, but Fidishun (n.d.) said “In spite of their need for autonomy, previous schooling has made them dependent learners. It is the job of the adult educator to move adult students away from their old habits and into new patterns of learning where they become self-directed, taking responsibility for their own learning and the direction it takes.”  Technology can help facilitate this as Fidishun (n.d.) said because it provides adult students the ability to "skip sections a student already understands, and multiple forms of presentation of material which can assist people with various learning styles.”  As a computer applications instructor in adult education, I have the unique opportunity to introduce adult learners to computer technology, the Internet, computer applications and programs that will benefit them throughout their academic and professional lives and careers, as well as aid them in becoming true autonomous learners that is one of the tenets of the adult learning theory espoused by Knowles.

References

Cooper, S. (2009). Theories of learning in educational psychology: Malcolm Knowles and the theory of andragogy. Retrieved from

Fidishun, D. (n.d.). Andragogy and technology: Integrating adult learning theory as we teach with technology. Retrieved from http://frank.mtsu.edu/~itconf/proceed00/fidishun.htm

Smith, M. K. (2002). Malcolm Knowles, informal adult education, self-direction and andragogy: The encyclopedia of informal education. Retrieved from http://www.infed.org/thinkers/et-knowl.htm


Thursday, May 10, 2012

Johnson Module 5 Blog


New Technologies

I was the assistant to the principal at a public high school in one of San Diego’s school districts when the district started using Outlook calendar to schedule meetings.  My principal used a calendar which she carried around with her penciling in appointments as she made them.  As her assistant, I got calls from the superintendent and other officials from central office, as well as parents and community members wanting to schedule meetings with her.  If she wasn’t in her office, I had to try to decipher her writing in her calendar to see if she was available.  If she wasn’t on campus, I had to go through a lot of extra steps to try and facilitate these meetings.  If this principal had used the calendaring convenience of Outlook, other district employees would have been able to view her availability and it would have made scheduling meetings with multiple parties so much simpler.  They would have sent her a calendar invitation which she could choose to accept or reject.  She could also have given me calendar rights so I could accept and/or view her calendar and act as her intermediary in these cases that came up a lot.  This principal remained adamant about not using Outlook calendar for the entire three years I worked with her.  Based on Keller’s ARC, I think this principal was not motivated to change from her comfortable archaic method of calendaring her appointments.  She saw no need to change, and did not perceive my suggestions as important or relevant.  I also think she lacked confidence in her technological skills and was hesitant to give up her pencil and paper calendar because of that. 

I was not an adult education computer applications instructor at the time, or I may have been more patient and used different tactics to try and persuade her.  I do believe she was one of the principals who was forced by her superiors in the district office to begin using Outlook calendar after I no longer worked there.  If I was working there then, I would have worked with her to show her how simple the program was to use, and let her see firsthand the relevancy of it.  I think if she had used it with me as support, she would have developed confidence in how efficiently the system worked.  She would have been able to see how much easier it made her work day, and with all her other responsibilities, delegating keeping her calendar to her assistant would have given her more time for other priorities. 

The way I presented Outlook calendar to her obviously did not capture her attention nor “stimulate lasting curiosity” (Driscoll, 2005, p. 339), but I could have done that by offering an after-school class to teach her and the other administrators how to use the program, then let them practice scheduling meetings on each other’s calendars and mine over a period of a few days or weeks.  This would have given them an opportunity to see the relevance of the program, and also given them opportunities to develop confidence using it.  I loved Outlook calendar when I was trying to keep track of appointments as a school district employee, so I feel confident had I known then what I know now and approached the subject differently, the result would have been not only the principal but her assistants and administrative staff all coming on board with using it to complete satisfaction!

Reference

Driscoll, M.P. (2005). Psychology of learning for instruction. Pearson: Boston, MA

Thursday, April 26, 2012

Johnson Module 4 Blog




What a discovery! Almost every important aspect of my life is connected and interconnected using technology and the Internet/World Wide Web!  I keep in touch with friends, family and acquaintances mainly via the online social network on Facebook.  I read and post on walls; I contribute to and read newsfeeds and discussions threads from the President and First Lady, to Walden University’s Facebook page, MSNBC’s page, and so forth.  Not only is social media a social interaction mechanism, but it is an educational environment as well. 

The way I learn has changed largely in part because my means of networking has changed.  The Internet has allowed me to connect with people I would not otherwise meet or interact so intimately with.  I can watch news interactively and engage in discussions and debates with others who comment on the same news or article I read or watched. 

These are all forms of learning, and being able to network with people from around the world using the latest technology makes it all possible at a heightened degree over how it was possible ten or twenty years ago. 

The digital tools that enhance my learning are applications I can download onto my smartphone and carry with me.  I can interact on many of the same websites I utilize for educational and social purposes on my computer from my smart phone.  If anyone emails me, sends me a chat message, or an inbox message on Facebook, I have apps on my phone that notify me and make those emails and messages instantly available to me. 

When I have questions there are numerous ways I can go about finding the answer using technology.  I constantly type questions in the search field of search engines like Google and even before I tap the enter key, a plethora of answers to my question begin to populate the field.  This has been my most common way of learning new knowledge.  If I hear of something, or see something I only partly understand if at all, I form it into a question and “ask Google.”  Online search engines allow me to research, compare and contrast a limitless knowledge base.  I can compare the opinions of others, and find solutions to almost any question or problem I may encounter.  I believe I know much more in this present age than I knew even ten years ago just because of the ever increasing knowledge base that is available to me via technology that I can access and use via the world wide web. 

Thursday, April 12, 2012

Johnson Module 3 Blog


Rheingold presented an effective case for the instinctive forming of groups to work together and solve problems from the beginning of history until now.  He suggested that if people had not worked together, for example, how would they have first been able to bring down a huge dinosaur, and distributed the meat so that it did not spoil?  In response to the prisoner game, Rheingold quoted Eleanor Ostrom as saying “People are only prisoners if they consider themselves to be.”  New forms of cooperation, Rheingold posits, have always helped create new forms of wealth.  These new forms of cooperation have been assisted by enabling technologies, which led to the development of eBay, Google, Wikipedia, and so forth.  According to Rheingold, Wikipedia was jointly developed by thousands of volunteers, and contains approximately 1.5 million articles in several hundred languages.   It is an invaluable tool to billions of people, and is only available because of the collaboration of those thousands of people who worked cooperatively to develop it.  Rheingold surmised that people work cooperatively because doing so is in their best interests.  I believe people do have a basic instinct to work cooperatively and that is because there has always been some form of benefit, or “wealth”, to those who do. 

Technology can continue to facilitate collaboration by providing tools whereby learners can collectively research, read, write, and share information that provides benefit or wealth to all participants.  These tools can be blogs, wikis, chat programs, synchronous online meeting software, Skype, mobile technologies, and the like.   In Maximizing the Impact of Teacher Collaboration the authors posit that “Collaboration between teachers can be a powerful tool for professional development and a driver for school improvement,” further when used correctly “Structured professional collaboration that focuses on improved instruction benefits both teachers and students (2008).   This confirms the position Rheingold presented of effective collaboration being innate in human beings since the beginning of time, and provides insight into the benefit of such cooperative collaboration for learners and instructors.

References

Education.com (2008). Maximizing the impact of teacher collaboration. Retrieved from


TED Conferences, LLC (2005). (Video program). Howard Rheingold: The new power of

collaboration. Retrieved from


Thursday, March 29, 2012

Johnson Module 2 Blog



There is so much discussion of learning theories that as an educator and a student, I get confused when I am asked to choose one over another.  Reading Bill Kerr’s blog (http://billkerr2.blogspot.com/2007/01/isms-as-filter-not-blinker.html) leads me to conclude I am not the only one who has confusion -ism.  For example, Kerr posed the question How else could we have a big change without a theory to justify it and help us think about it?”  He posits that different learning theories (i.e. –isms) might just be necessary to facilitate meaningful instruction by saying “I’m not entirely sure but I am more inclined to think that we need big change. That might mean the -isms are necessary. You might develop a new unit of work under the influence of constructionism, for instance. The learning theory is indispensable to the curriculum reform effort.

I would agree that learning theories do serve to explain how students learn, as well as how instructors teach, and how to most effectively do both.  However, rather than choosing one theory over the other I am more included to agree with Karl Kapp who said in his blog (http://www.kaplaneduneering.com/kappnotes/index.php/2007/01/out-and-about-discussion-on-educational/) “We need to take pieces from each school of thought and apply it effectively because… Cognitivism doesn’t explain 100% how humans process information and neither does Constructivism or Behaviorism. What we need to is take the best from each philosophy and use it wisely to create solid educational experiences for our learners.”  Some may conclude I have chosen the easy way out by saying I see pieces of each learning theory in myself as instructor and student, as well as in my students, but it is far from an easy conclusion to draw.  The challenge for me as an instructor is to develop instruction that has components that correlate to its counterpart in learning theory.  That is not easy to do, and remains a challenge for me to identify what theory and what component of my instruction and my students’ learning complement each other.



Thursday, March 15, 2012

Johnson Module 1 Blog


What are your beliefs about how people learn best? What is the purpose of learning theory in educational technology?

As an instructor in adult education, my focus is on adult learners, and older adult learners. I believe students in this age range learn best when they are actively engaged in their learning. Adult learners need to know what they are learning has value, and be able to see how they can apply it in their lives for professional or personal reasons in order to engage them in the learning process. Without their buy-in, the instructor wastes time and energy trying to teach.

Cross’ adult learning theory (Kulatta, 2011) is based on the following principles:

1.  Adult learning programs should capitalize on the experience of participants.

2.  Adult learning programs should adapt to the aging limitations of the participants.

3.  Adults should be challenged to move to increasingly advanced stages of personal development. 

4.  Adults should have as much choice as possible in the availability and organization of learning programs.

Educational technology can be a catalyst for guiding instruction that best meets the needs of the adult learner. Not only does the use of educational technology benefit the instructor, but it develops the adult and older adult learner as students of technology as well. I teach an introductory computer applications course to adults whose average age range is between 55 – 70 years old. Many are touching computers for the first time. Understanding the learning theory that defines students in this age range guides the methods I use to introduce them to technology in the supposition they will take what they learn in my class, apply it to their life situation, and progress as students of technology.

Reference

Kulatta, R. (2011) Instructional design: Adult learning (K.P. Cross). Retrieved from http://www.instructionaldesign.org/index.html