Thursday, April 26, 2012

Johnson Module 4 Blog




What a discovery! Almost every important aspect of my life is connected and interconnected using technology and the Internet/World Wide Web!  I keep in touch with friends, family and acquaintances mainly via the online social network on Facebook.  I read and post on walls; I contribute to and read newsfeeds and discussions threads from the President and First Lady, to Walden University’s Facebook page, MSNBC’s page, and so forth.  Not only is social media a social interaction mechanism, but it is an educational environment as well. 

The way I learn has changed largely in part because my means of networking has changed.  The Internet has allowed me to connect with people I would not otherwise meet or interact so intimately with.  I can watch news interactively and engage in discussions and debates with others who comment on the same news or article I read or watched. 

These are all forms of learning, and being able to network with people from around the world using the latest technology makes it all possible at a heightened degree over how it was possible ten or twenty years ago. 

The digital tools that enhance my learning are applications I can download onto my smartphone and carry with me.  I can interact on many of the same websites I utilize for educational and social purposes on my computer from my smart phone.  If anyone emails me, sends me a chat message, or an inbox message on Facebook, I have apps on my phone that notify me and make those emails and messages instantly available to me. 

When I have questions there are numerous ways I can go about finding the answer using technology.  I constantly type questions in the search field of search engines like Google and even before I tap the enter key, a plethora of answers to my question begin to populate the field.  This has been my most common way of learning new knowledge.  If I hear of something, or see something I only partly understand if at all, I form it into a question and “ask Google.”  Online search engines allow me to research, compare and contrast a limitless knowledge base.  I can compare the opinions of others, and find solutions to almost any question or problem I may encounter.  I believe I know much more in this present age than I knew even ten years ago just because of the ever increasing knowledge base that is available to me via technology that I can access and use via the world wide web. 

Thursday, April 12, 2012

Johnson Module 3 Blog


Rheingold presented an effective case for the instinctive forming of groups to work together and solve problems from the beginning of history until now.  He suggested that if people had not worked together, for example, how would they have first been able to bring down a huge dinosaur, and distributed the meat so that it did not spoil?  In response to the prisoner game, Rheingold quoted Eleanor Ostrom as saying “People are only prisoners if they consider themselves to be.”  New forms of cooperation, Rheingold posits, have always helped create new forms of wealth.  These new forms of cooperation have been assisted by enabling technologies, which led to the development of eBay, Google, Wikipedia, and so forth.  According to Rheingold, Wikipedia was jointly developed by thousands of volunteers, and contains approximately 1.5 million articles in several hundred languages.   It is an invaluable tool to billions of people, and is only available because of the collaboration of those thousands of people who worked cooperatively to develop it.  Rheingold surmised that people work cooperatively because doing so is in their best interests.  I believe people do have a basic instinct to work cooperatively and that is because there has always been some form of benefit, or “wealth”, to those who do. 

Technology can continue to facilitate collaboration by providing tools whereby learners can collectively research, read, write, and share information that provides benefit or wealth to all participants.  These tools can be blogs, wikis, chat programs, synchronous online meeting software, Skype, mobile technologies, and the like.   In Maximizing the Impact of Teacher Collaboration the authors posit that “Collaboration between teachers can be a powerful tool for professional development and a driver for school improvement,” further when used correctly “Structured professional collaboration that focuses on improved instruction benefits both teachers and students” (2008).   This confirms the position Rheingold presented of effective collaboration being innate in human beings since the beginning of time, and provides insight into the benefit of such cooperative collaboration for learners and instructors.

References

Education.com (2008). Maximizing the impact of teacher collaboration. Retrieved from


TED Conferences, LLC (2005). (Video program). Howard Rheingold: The new power of

collaboration. Retrieved from


Thursday, March 29, 2012

Johnson Module 2 Blog



There is so much discussion of learning theories that as an educator and a student, I get confused when I am asked to choose one over another.  Reading Bill Kerr’s blog (http://billkerr2.blogspot.com/2007/01/isms-as-filter-not-blinker.html) leads me to conclude I am not the only one who has confusion -ism.  For example, Kerr posed the question “How else could we have a big change without a theory to justify it and help us think about it?”  He posits that different learning theories (i.e. –isms) might just be necessary to facilitate meaningful instruction by saying “I’m not entirely sure but I am more inclined to think that we need big change. That might mean the -isms are necessary. You might develop a new unit of work under the influence of constructionism, for instance. The learning theory is indispensable to the curriculum reform effort. “

I would agree that learning theories do serve to explain how students learn, as well as how instructors teach, and how to most effectively do both.  However, rather than choosing one theory over the other I am more included to agree with Karl Kapp who said in his blog (http://www.kaplaneduneering.com/kappnotes/index.php/2007/01/out-and-about-discussion-on-educational/) “We need to take pieces from each school of thought and apply it effectively because… Cognitivism doesn’t explain 100% how humans process information and neither does Constructivism or Behaviorism. What we need to is take the best from each philosophy and use it wisely to create solid educational experiences for our learners.”  Some may conclude I have chosen the easy way out by saying I see pieces of each learning theory in myself as instructor and student, as well as in my students, but it is far from an easy conclusion to draw.  The challenge for me as an instructor is to develop instruction that has components that correlate to its counterpart in learning theory.  That is not easy to do, and remains a challenge for me to identify what theory and what component of my instruction and my students’ learning complement each other.